<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (11) TMI 246 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88693</link>
    <description>Steel shots used in shot blasting were treated as part of the machine-assisted process, not as independent tools capable of performing the operation by themselves. Applying the Larger Bench view on the meaning of &quot;tools&quot; in the Explanation to Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, they were held outside the excluded category for Modvat purposes. The departmental challenge to Modvat credit therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:11:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (11) TMI 246 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88693</link>
      <description>Steel shots used in shot blasting were treated as part of the machine-assisted process, not as independent tools capable of performing the operation by themselves. Applying the Larger Bench view on the meaning of &quot;tools&quot; in the Explanation to Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, they were held outside the excluded category for Modvat purposes. The departmental challenge to Modvat credit therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>