<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 136 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88685</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the testing charges paid to a specialized agency for additional tests conducted at the Railways&#039; request should not be included in the assessable value of goods. The decision was based on established legal principles and consistent precedents, distinguishing the case from one involving inspection charges. The Tribunal referenced previous decisions, including the Shree Pipes Ltd. case, to support its conclusion that such testing charges should not impact the assessable value of the goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:48:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 136 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88685</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the testing charges paid to a specialized agency for additional tests conducted at the Railways&#039; request should not be included in the assessable value of goods. The decision was based on established legal principles and consistent precedents, distinguishing the case from one involving inspection charges. The Tribunal referenced previous decisions, including the Shree Pipes Ltd. case, to support its conclusion that such testing charges should not impact the assessable value of the goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>