<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (5) TMI 84 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88677</link>
    <description>An appeal dismissed for default in appearance was restored after the appellant explained that the hearing notice had not been received by the unit handling legal matters. The restoration application was allowed, the dismissal order was set aside, and the appeal was reinstated for hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:56:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (5) TMI 84 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88677</link>
      <description>An appeal dismissed for default in appearance was restored after the appellant explained that the hearing notice had not been received by the unit handling legal matters. The restoration application was allowed, the dismissal order was set aside, and the appeal was reinstated for hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>