https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88674 Non-compliance with a Tribunal stay order requiring a cash deposit and bank guarantee can trigger action under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Here, the Tribunal found no record that the appellants had complied with the stay terms and noted that their communication to counsel did not establish deposit of the specified sums or furnishing of the required security. It therefore directed the Registry to issue a show-cause notice asking why the appeals should not be dismissed for failure to comply, fixed a compliance date, and warned that non-filing of the report would result in dismissal without further reference. en-us Mon, 25 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:53:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88674 Non-compliance with a Tribunal stay order requiring a cash deposit and bank guarantee can trigger action under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Here, the Tribunal found no record that the appellants had complied with the stay terms and noted that their communication to counsel did not establish deposit of the specified sums or furnishing of the required security. It therefore directed the Registry to issue a show-cause notice asking why the appeals should not be dismissed for failure to comply, fixed a compliance date, and warned that non-filing of the report would result in dismissal without further reference. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 25 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88674