<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (5) TMI 77 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88670</link>
    <description>Blended yarn was treated as classifiable under sub-heading 5506.21 where the staple fibre content exceeded 40% by weight of total fibre content. The record showed that, on a dry mass basis, the polyester staple fibre in the samples was above that threshold, and the textile research opinion supported testing on a dry mass basis because moisture regain figures could vary with conditions. The relevant textile specification also indicated that component percentages should be calculated on a dry mass basis. The narrower moisture regain method was therefore not accepted, and the departmental classification under sub-heading 5506.29 was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:45:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (5) TMI 77 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88670</link>
      <description>Blended yarn was treated as classifiable under sub-heading 5506.21 where the staple fibre content exceeded 40% by weight of total fibre content. The record showed that, on a dry mass basis, the polyester staple fibre in the samples was above that threshold, and the textile research opinion supported testing on a dry mass basis because moisture regain figures could vary with conditions. The relevant textile specification also indicated that component percentages should be calculated on a dry mass basis. The narrower moisture regain method was therefore not accepted, and the departmental classification under sub-heading 5506.29 was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>