<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (5) TMI 70 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88663</link>
    <description>Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted pending appeal because earlier Tribunal decisions on similar facts had already considered limitation and merits, and those decisions indicated that the extended period was not invocable. The Bench recorded a prima facie view that the appellant had made out a good case for interim relief, so pre-deposit was waived and recovery stayed until disposal of the appeal. The request for early hearing was also accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:08:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (5) TMI 70 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88663</link>
      <description>Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted pending appeal because earlier Tribunal decisions on similar facts had already considered limitation and merits, and those decisions indicated that the extended period was not invocable. The Bench recorded a prima facie view that the appellant had made out a good case for interim relief, so pre-deposit was waived and recovery stayed until disposal of the appeal. The request for early hearing was also accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>