<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (5) TMI 64 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88657</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the lower authority, ruling in favor of the company in a Revenue appeal regarding the valuation of Ferro Silcon cleared under different price lists for distinct quality grades. The Tribunal determined that the approved price lists for different classes of buyers were acceptable, emphasizing that sales from depots were solely to dealers. Citing a previous decision, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, highlighting the lack of evidence to dispute the established marketing pattern of sales from depots to dealers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:44:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (5) TMI 64 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88657</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the lower authority, ruling in favor of the company in a Revenue appeal regarding the valuation of Ferro Silcon cleared under different price lists for distinct quality grades. The Tribunal determined that the approved price lists for different classes of buyers were acceptable, emphasizing that sales from depots were solely to dealers. Citing a previous decision, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, highlighting the lack of evidence to dispute the established marketing pattern of sales from depots to dealers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>