<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (5) TMI 62 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88655</link>
    <description>Unmachined iron castings and unmachined cast articles of iron were treated as eligible for exemption under Notification No. 275/88 where the goods were manufactured from duty-paid specified inputs and no input credit had been taken under the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The text states that the products had undergone no machining operations, and the processes relied on by the department were not machining. It further notes that the omitted finding on Notification No. 275/88 was an error apparent and could be corrected in rectification. Once eligibility under Notification No. 275/88 was established, Notification No. 223/88 was not the controlling issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:42:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (5) TMI 62 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88655</link>
      <description>Unmachined iron castings and unmachined cast articles of iron were treated as eligible for exemption under Notification No. 275/88 where the goods were manufactured from duty-paid specified inputs and no input credit had been taken under the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The text states that the products had undergone no machining operations, and the processes relied on by the department were not machining. It further notes that the omitted finding on Notification No. 275/88 was an error apparent and could be corrected in rectification. Once eligibility under Notification No. 275/88 was established, Notification No. 223/88 was not the controlling issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>