<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 212 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88632</link>
    <description>RUSTILD DW was treated as an input directly used in the manufacture of steel strips because it lubricated the final product to prevent rusting, rather than lubricating machinery. On that factual basis, the input qualified for Modvat credit under Rule 57 of the Central Excise Rules, and the Revenue&#039;s contrary view was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 12:51:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 212 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88632</link>
      <description>RUSTILD DW was treated as an input directly used in the manufacture of steel strips because it lubricated the final product to prevent rusting, rather than lubricating machinery. On that factual basis, the input qualified for Modvat credit under Rule 57 of the Central Excise Rules, and the Revenue&#039;s contrary view was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>