<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 204 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88624</link>
    <description>Wooden shutters manufactured by cutting, finger-jointing, grooving and planing wood for use in windows and doors were held not to fall under Heading 44.05 as merely continuously shaped wood. The goods were treated as completed articles of wood under Heading 44.10, because the record showed no basis to disturb the classification accepted by the appellate authority. On that footing, the Revenue&#039;s challenge to classification under Heading 4405.00 failed and was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 12:26:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 204 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88624</link>
      <description>Wooden shutters manufactured by cutting, finger-jointing, grooving and planing wood for use in windows and doors were held not to fall under Heading 44.05 as merely continuously shaped wood. The goods were treated as completed articles of wood under Heading 44.10, because the record showed no basis to disturb the classification accepted by the appellate authority. On that footing, the Revenue&#039;s challenge to classification under Heading 4405.00 failed and was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>