https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88596 An appeal dismissed for non-appearance under Rule 20 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 was later recalled after the appellant's absence was satisfactorily explained. The tribunal accepted the explanation for failure to appear and treated it as sufficient cause to justify setting aside the default dismissal. The earlier order dismissing the appeal was therefore recalled, and the appeal was restored to its original number. en-us Thu, 19 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Sep 2011 18:19:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88596 An appeal dismissed for non-appearance under Rule 20 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 was later recalled after the appellant's absence was satisfactorily explained. The tribunal accepted the explanation for failure to appear and treated it as sufficient cause to justify setting aside the default dismissal. The earlier order dismissing the appeal was therefore recalled, and the appeal was restored to its original number. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 19 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88596