<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 315 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88594</link>
    <description>The value of CID joint material supplied with A.C. pressure pipes was held not to form part of the pipes&#039; assessable value because it was treated as a bought-out item supplied only to a Government department, not to all customers, and there was no evidence that it was an integral part of the pipes. The earlier view that the cost of similar optional items is excluded from assessable value was followed, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 18:17:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 315 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88594</link>
      <description>The value of CID joint material supplied with A.C. pressure pipes was held not to form part of the pipes&#039; assessable value because it was treated as a bought-out item supplied only to a Government department, not to all customers, and there was no evidence that it was an integral part of the pipes. The earlier view that the cost of similar optional items is excluded from assessable value was followed, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>