<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 307 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88586</link>
    <description>HDPE bags and sacks used as packaging in cement manufacture were treated as eligible inputs for Modvat credit under Rule 57A because the exclusion clause was read as not covering them merely due to Chapter 39 classification. On delay, the Tribunal applied the principle that, in the absence of an express limitation under Rule 57G, Modvat credit must be claimed within a reasonable period, treated on these facts as six months from receipt of the inputs. Credit beyond that period was disallowed, while entitlement for the immediately preceding six-month period was left to factual verification by the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner on remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:51:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 307 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88586</link>
      <description>HDPE bags and sacks used as packaging in cement manufacture were treated as eligible inputs for Modvat credit under Rule 57A because the exclusion clause was read as not covering them merely due to Chapter 39 classification. On delay, the Tribunal applied the principle that, in the absence of an express limitation under Rule 57G, Modvat credit must be claimed within a reasonable period, treated on these facts as six months from receipt of the inputs. Credit beyond that period was disallowed, while entitlement for the immediately preceding six-month period was left to factual verification by the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner on remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>