<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 282 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88561</link>
    <description>The Tribunal declined to stay the operation of the Commissioner (Appeals) order regarding the assessment of Customs duty on a ship purchased for breaking up into scrap. It held that the ship, built in India, was exempt from duty under Notification 118/59. The Tribunal rejected the argument that the ship lost its character as an ocean-going vessel when imported for breaking up, distinguishing between different notifications governing duty exemptions for vessels. As a significant portion of the ship had already been broken into scrap and cleared, the Tribunal found the application for stay impractical and dismissed it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:43:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 282 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88561</link>
      <description>The Tribunal declined to stay the operation of the Commissioner (Appeals) order regarding the assessment of Customs duty on a ship purchased for breaking up into scrap. It held that the ship, built in India, was exempt from duty under Notification 118/59. The Tribunal rejected the argument that the ship lost its character as an ocean-going vessel when imported for breaking up, distinguishing between different notifications governing duty exemptions for vessels. As a significant portion of the ship had already been broken into scrap and cleared, the Tribunal found the application for stay impractical and dismissed it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>