<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 273 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88552</link>
    <description>Motor running capacitors were treated as power capacitors for Notification No. 188/87-Cus., because the ISI specifications showed that motor capacitors are a recognised type of power capacitor used with asynchronous motors in single-phase systems. The narrower argument that they were outside the term &quot;power capacitors&quot; was rejected, and the appellate view distinguishing motor capacitors from power capacitors was held to be incorrect. Accordingly, the goods fell within the notification&#039;s excluded category and did not qualify for concessional treatment; the order-in-original was restored and the revenue&#039;s appeal succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:23:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 273 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88552</link>
      <description>Motor running capacitors were treated as power capacitors for Notification No. 188/87-Cus., because the ISI specifications showed that motor capacitors are a recognised type of power capacitor used with asynchronous motors in single-phase systems. The narrower argument that they were outside the term &quot;power capacitors&quot; was rejected, and the appellate view distinguishing motor capacitors from power capacitors was held to be incorrect. Accordingly, the goods fell within the notification&#039;s excluded category and did not qualify for concessional treatment; the order-in-original was restored and the revenue&#039;s appeal succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>