<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 269 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88548</link>
    <description>Woven sacks of polymers of ethylene or propylene made from fabric produced on circular looms were held outside the scope of Notification No. 223/86-C.E. as amended, because the exemption expressly excluded sacks manufactured on circular looms. The Board circular relied on by the claimant was treated as dealing with a different classification question and not the exemption&#039;s scope. A later explanation inserted by Notification No. 57/90-C.E. was treated as clarificatory and not as a change in the earlier legal position. On a harmonious reading of the proviso, sacks made from circular-loom fabric remained excluded from the exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:11:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 269 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88548</link>
      <description>Woven sacks of polymers of ethylene or propylene made from fabric produced on circular looms were held outside the scope of Notification No. 223/86-C.E. as amended, because the exemption expressly excluded sacks manufactured on circular looms. The Board circular relied on by the claimant was treated as dealing with a different classification question and not the exemption&#039;s scope. A later explanation inserted by Notification No. 57/90-C.E. was treated as clarificatory and not as a change in the earlier legal position. On a harmonious reading of the proviso, sacks made from circular-loom fabric remained excluded from the exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>