<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 239 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88527</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi, ruled on the classification of goods under the Central Excise Tariff, specifically sub-heading 2404.50 or 2404.60. The Tribunal held that the goods, post the Tariff change with the addition of menthol, fell under the newly inserted sub-heading 2404.60. It emphasized the importance of examining the manufacturing process to determine classification. The Tribunal set aside previous orders and remanded the matters for re-examination by the jurisdictional Commissioner (Appeals) in accordance with its decisions, allowing the manufacturers to present their case. All appeals and cross-objections were remanded for further review and decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 14:51:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 239 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88527</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi, ruled on the classification of goods under the Central Excise Tariff, specifically sub-heading 2404.50 or 2404.60. The Tribunal held that the goods, post the Tariff change with the addition of menthol, fell under the newly inserted sub-heading 2404.60. It emphasized the importance of examining the manufacturing process to determine classification. The Tribunal set aside previous orders and remanded the matters for re-examination by the jurisdictional Commissioner (Appeals) in accordance with its decisions, allowing the manufacturers to present their case. All appeals and cross-objections were remanded for further review and decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>