<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 238 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88526</link>
    <description>Wire mesh and felts were treated as eligible inputs for Modvat credit under Rule 57A because they were used in or in relation to the manufacture of paper and paper boards and did not fall within the exclusion clause in the explanation to the rule. The Tribunal followed its earlier decision in the assessee&#039;s own case and the Larger Bench view on the same question, and concluded that credit was admissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 14:50:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 238 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88526</link>
      <description>Wire mesh and felts were treated as eligible inputs for Modvat credit under Rule 57A because they were used in or in relation to the manufacture of paper and paper boards and did not fall within the exclusion clause in the explanation to the rule. The Tribunal followed its earlier decision in the assessee&#039;s own case and the Larger Bench view on the same question, and concluded that credit was admissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>