<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 231 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88519</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi rejected the stay application for future demand due to lack of precedent and jurisdiction to grant such a stay. The Tribunal noted the absence of any orders staying future demands post the introduction of interest provisions in the relevant law. The application, filed by the applicants and opposed by the Respondent, was ultimately denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 14:28:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 231 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88519</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi rejected the stay application for future demand due to lack of precedent and jurisdiction to grant such a stay. The Tribunal noted the absence of any orders staying future demands post the introduction of interest provisions in the relevant law. The application, filed by the applicants and opposed by the Respondent, was ultimately denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>