<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 381 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88502</link>
    <description>Exemption notifications covering ball point pens, parts of ball point pens and refills were held to extend to brass tips manufactured for pen refills, because departmental correspondence and consistent administrative practice showed that such tips had long been treated as covered. The Tribunal applied the principle that where an exemption applies to a product&#039;s parts, sub-parts of those parts are not excluded merely because they are not named separately. On that basis, the show cause notice proceeded on a mistaken assumption of dutiability, and the duty demand, penalties and confiscation order were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 13:05:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 381 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88502</link>
      <description>Exemption notifications covering ball point pens, parts of ball point pens and refills were held to extend to brass tips manufactured for pen refills, because departmental correspondence and consistent administrative practice showed that such tips had long been treated as covered. The Tribunal applied the principle that where an exemption applies to a product&#039;s parts, sub-parts of those parts are not excluded merely because they are not named separately. On that basis, the show cause notice proceeded on a mistaken assumption of dutiability, and the duty demand, penalties and confiscation order were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>