https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88480 In a classification dispute concerning PEG 300 to PEG 600, the stay application was allowed because the classification issue under Chapters 29 and 39 of the Central Excise Tariff Act was considered debatable on the material then available. The applicants relied on approved classification lists, departmental test reports, and a prior appellate order covering similar products, which supported a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit. On that basis, pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived and the appeals were directed to be heard on merits without immediate payment. en-us Fri, 07 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:12:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88480 In a classification dispute concerning PEG 300 to PEG 600, the stay application was allowed because the classification issue under Chapters 29 and 39 of the Central Excise Tariff Act was considered debatable on the material then available. The applicants relied on approved classification lists, departmental test reports, and a prior appellate order covering similar products, which supported a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit. On that basis, pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived and the appeals were directed to be heard on merits without immediate payment. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 07 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88480