<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (10) TMI 234 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88474</link>
    <description>Delay in filing a declaration under Rule 57G(1) could be considered for condonation under Rule 57G(5), and non-consideration of the request by the adjudicating authority required fresh examination on natural justice grounds. On Modvat credit, denial based on endorsed invoices was upheld because that issue had already been settled against admissibility. For the remaining claim, the absence of a duplicate transporter copy was treated as a curable procedural defect where receipt of inputs, duty payment, and use in manufacture were not disputed, and rectified documents were to be examined afresh.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:00:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (10) TMI 234 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88474</link>
      <description>Delay in filing a declaration under Rule 57G(1) could be considered for condonation under Rule 57G(5), and non-consideration of the request by the adjudicating authority required fresh examination on natural justice grounds. On Modvat credit, denial based on endorsed invoices was upheld because that issue had already been settled against admissibility. For the remaining claim, the absence of a duplicate transporter copy was treated as a curable procedural defect where receipt of inputs, duty payment, and use in manufacture were not disputed, and rectified documents were to be examined afresh.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>