<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (8) TMI 263 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88470</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that penalties imposed on the applicants for alleged diversion of goods from Nepal to India, based on discrepancies in Customs Transit Declaration and letter of credit, were unjustified. The Indo-Nepal Treaty of Trade &amp;amp; Transit was invoked to argue against confiscation unless goods reached the Nepal border. The Tribunal emphasized the limited role of Indian Customs in transit goods to Nepal and directed actions under Customs House Agents Regulations instead of imposing penalties. The penalties were set aside, and the Appeals were allowed, with potential actions against the Customs House Agent involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:46:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (8) TMI 263 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88470</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that penalties imposed on the applicants for alleged diversion of goods from Nepal to India, based on discrepancies in Customs Transit Declaration and letter of credit, were unjustified. The Indo-Nepal Treaty of Trade &amp;amp; Transit was invoked to argue against confiscation unless goods reached the Nepal border. The Tribunal emphasized the limited role of Indian Customs in transit goods to Nepal and directed actions under Customs House Agents Regulations instead of imposing penalties. The penalties were set aside, and the Appeals were allowed, with potential actions against the Customs House Agent involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>