<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 397 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88469</link>
    <description>Cuprous tubes imported as such were treated as tubes and not as fabricated condenser parts, because they were invoiced and priced as raw materials and no fabrication had been carried out. The same classification issue had already been decided in the appellant&#039;s own case, where the items were classified under Heading 74.07/08 rather than Heading 84.04/05. Following that earlier ruling, the impugned classification was upheld and the goods were held classifiable as tubes, not as parts of a condenser of turbines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:45:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 397 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88469</link>
      <description>Cuprous tubes imported as such were treated as tubes and not as fabricated condenser parts, because they were invoiced and priced as raw materials and no fabrication had been carried out. The same classification issue had already been decided in the appellant&#039;s own case, where the items were classified under Heading 74.07/08 rather than Heading 84.04/05. Following that earlier ruling, the impugned classification was upheld and the goods were held classifiable as tubes, not as parts of a condenser of turbines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>