<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 392 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88464</link>
    <description>Where imported sucrose was scientifically and commercially synonymous with refined sugar, it fell within the scope of the exemption notification for refined sugar under CTH 17.01. The relevant classification was read in light of recognised reference materials and the HSN explanatory notes, which supported treating sucrose as a form of sugar rather than a separate commodity. On that basis, exemption could not be denied merely because the notification used the term &quot;refined sugar&quot; instead of &quot;sucrose&quot;; the import was therefore treated as eligible for the notification benefit and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 18:47:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 392 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88464</link>
      <description>Where imported sucrose was scientifically and commercially synonymous with refined sugar, it fell within the scope of the exemption notification for refined sugar under CTH 17.01. The relevant classification was read in light of recognised reference materials and the HSN explanatory notes, which supported treating sucrose as a form of sugar rather than a separate commodity. On that basis, exemption could not be denied merely because the notification used the term &quot;refined sugar&quot; instead of &quot;sucrose&quot;; the import was therefore treated as eligible for the notification benefit and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>