<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 234 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88453</link>
    <description>Classification of a rhodium-based catalyst depended on whether it was a supported catalyst under Chapter Heading 3815.12 or a compound of precious metals under Chapter Heading 2843.90. The text stresses that a product can fall in Chapter 28 only if it is first shown to be a compound covered by the relevant chapter notes, and that Chapter 38 and Chapter 28 must be examined against the HSN explanatory material, test report, and technical composition. In a technically complex dispute, specialist chemical evidence and disclosure of the test report to the assessee are material. The original classification could not be sustained and the matter required fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 18:17:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 234 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88453</link>
      <description>Classification of a rhodium-based catalyst depended on whether it was a supported catalyst under Chapter Heading 3815.12 or a compound of precious metals under Chapter Heading 2843.90. The text stresses that a product can fall in Chapter 28 only if it is first shown to be a compound covered by the relevant chapter notes, and that Chapter 38 and Chapter 28 must be examined against the HSN explanatory material, test report, and technical composition. In a technically complex dispute, specialist chemical evidence and disclosure of the test report to the assessee are material. The original classification could not be sustained and the matter required fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>