<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 279 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88447</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 1.00 lac within two months, with the balance amount of duty and penalty to be waived upon compliance, ensuring machinery protection. The Tribunal&#039;s decision considered the proportionality and justification of penalties imposed on the concern and its proprietor, aiming to balance the interests of the appellant while ensuring compliance with duty obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 18:07:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 279 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88447</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 1.00 lac within two months, with the balance amount of duty and penalty to be waived upon compliance, ensuring machinery protection. The Tribunal&#039;s decision considered the proportionality and justification of penalties imposed on the concern and its proprietor, aiming to balance the interests of the appellant while ensuring compliance with duty obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>