<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 277 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88445</link>
    <description>Modvat credit could be examined where the prescribed duplicate invoice was lost, provided the duty-paid character of the goods was verified and the Rule 57G safeguards were satisfied. The later amendment and Notification No. 23/94 were treated as reflecting the same principle and as supporting consideration of credit on the original invoice, even where the goods had been received before the notification. The denial was therefore set aside and the claim was remanded for fresh decision on compliance with the prescribed conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 18:03:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 277 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88445</link>
      <description>Modvat credit could be examined where the prescribed duplicate invoice was lost, provided the duty-paid character of the goods was verified and the Rule 57G safeguards were satisfied. The later amendment and Notification No. 23/94 were treated as reflecting the same principle and as supporting consideration of credit on the original invoice, even where the goods had been received before the notification. The denial was therefore set aside and the claim was remanded for fresh decision on compliance with the prescribed conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>