<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 198 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88413</link>
    <description>Where distributors purchase goods on a principal-to-principal basis at arm&#039;s length, the discount allowed to them is deductible as trade discount in computing assessable value and cannot be recharacterised as commission. The fact that distributors were obliged to promote sales and observe resale price limits did not change the character of the transactions, especially where there was no evidence of any additional consideration flowing back to the manufacturer and the goods were not returnable to it. On those facts, the distributors were treated as wholesale buyers rather than consignment agents, and the deduction of trade discount was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 16:43:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 198 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88413</link>
      <description>Where distributors purchase goods on a principal-to-principal basis at arm&#039;s length, the discount allowed to them is deductible as trade discount in computing assessable value and cannot be recharacterised as commission. The fact that distributors were obliged to promote sales and observe resale price limits did not change the character of the transactions, especially where there was no evidence of any additional consideration flowing back to the manufacturer and the goods were not returnable to it. On those facts, the distributors were treated as wholesale buyers rather than consignment agents, and the deduction of trade discount was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>