https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88410 CEGAT considered whether an Assistant Commissioner could adjudicate duty disputes exceeding Rs. 50,000. It followed its earlier view that such adjudication, even if made by the Assistant Commissioner, was at most an administrative irregularity and did not amount to a jurisdictional defect or legal infirmity. On that basis, the jurisdictional objection was rejected, the impugned order was set aside, and the matters were remanded for de novo adjudication by the Commissioner (Appeals). en-us Thu, 30 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Sep 2011 16:36:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88410 CEGAT considered whether an Assistant Commissioner could adjudicate duty disputes exceeding Rs. 50,000. It followed its earlier view that such adjudication, even if made by the Assistant Commissioner, was at most an administrative irregularity and did not amount to a jurisdictional defect or legal infirmity. On that basis, the jurisdictional objection was rejected, the impugned order was set aside, and the matters were remanded for de novo adjudication by the Commissioner (Appeals). Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 30 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88410