https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88405 The Tribunal found that the Commissioner's re-determination of liability under Section 3A of the Central Excise Act violated principles of natural justice as the applicants were not given a hearing or provided with the basis for the decision. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's orders and directed a re-determination of duty liability in accordance with the law, emphasizing the need for adherence to natural justice principles. The appeals were allowed, and stay petitions were disposed of. en-us Wed, 29 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Sep 2011 16:11:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88405 The Tribunal found that the Commissioner's re-determination of liability under Section 3A of the Central Excise Act violated principles of natural justice as the applicants were not given a hearing or provided with the basis for the decision. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's orders and directed a re-determination of duty liability in accordance with the law, emphasizing the need for adherence to natural justice principles. The appeals were allowed, and stay petitions were disposed of. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 29 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88405