<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 251 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88379</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT ruled that forwarding charges collected by the respondent should not be included in the assessable value, as they were collected to pay the agent for services to buyers. The appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 14:48:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 251 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88379</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT ruled that forwarding charges collected by the respondent should not be included in the assessable value, as they were collected to pay the agent for services to buyers. The appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>