<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 242 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88370</link>
    <description>Tea cess was held not leviable on tea waste because tea waste does not fall within the statutory definition of tea under Section 25 of the Tea Act, 1953. The Tribunal followed its earlier view on the scope of the definition and also noted the Board circular stating that no cess is to be collected on tea waste as so defined. The statutory levy could therefore not be extended to tea waste, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed, leaving the order in favour of the assessee undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 14:31:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 242 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88370</link>
      <description>Tea cess was held not leviable on tea waste because tea waste does not fall within the statutory definition of tea under Section 25 of the Tea Act, 1953. The Tribunal followed its earlier view on the scope of the definition and also noted the Board circular stating that no cess is to be collected on tea waste as so defined. The statutory levy could therefore not be extended to tea waste, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed, leaving the order in favour of the assessee undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>