<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 229 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88357</link>
    <description>Secondary packing costs for cardboard cartons were not required to be included in the assessable value of glucose biscuits cleared in wholesale at the factory gate, because the record showed the goods were marketed in sizeable quantity only in polybags without cardboard boxes. That factual finding was not displaced by any contrary evidence, and the exclusion of the disputed packing cost was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 13:36:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 229 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88357</link>
      <description>Secondary packing costs for cardboard cartons were not required to be included in the assessable value of glucose biscuits cleared in wholesale at the factory gate, because the record showed the goods were marketed in sizeable quantity only in polybags without cardboard boxes. That factual finding was not displaced by any contrary evidence, and the exclusion of the disputed packing cost was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>