<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 230 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88338</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand under Section 28 of the Customs Act on the appellant, emphasizing the legal validity of the bond executed for re-import of goods by the 100% EOU. The judgment underscores the adherence to customs regulations and the application of relevant legal provisions to ensure compliance with export obligations and customs duties, ultimately dismissing the appeals challenging the demand confirmation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 11:26:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 230 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88338</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand under Section 28 of the Customs Act on the appellant, emphasizing the legal validity of the bond executed for re-import of goods by the 100% EOU. The judgment underscores the adherence to customs regulations and the application of relevant legal provisions to ensure compliance with export obligations and customs duties, ultimately dismissing the appeals challenging the demand confirmation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>