<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 223 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88330</link>
    <description>Inspection charges for buyer-initiated inspection by a buyer-nominated agency were not part of the assessee&#039;s manufacturing or normal inspection cost and therefore were not includible in the assessable value of excisable goods. The assessee was entitled to refund of duty collected on that element, subject to Section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:39:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 223 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88330</link>
      <description>Inspection charges for buyer-initiated inspection by a buyer-nominated agency were not part of the assessee&#039;s manufacturing or normal inspection cost and therefore were not includible in the assessable value of excisable goods. The assessee was entitled to refund of duty collected on that element, subject to Section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>