<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 219 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88326</link>
    <description>Transaction value remains the normal basis for customs valuation and may be rejected only on valid grounds. For imported umbrella components, the Revenue failed to establish a reliable basis for discarding the declared value or for applying best judgment valuation under Rule 8 of the Customs (Valuation) Rules, 1988. The pro rata enhancement adopted by the lower authorities was therefore not sustainable, and the declared transaction value could not be rejected on the facts stated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:32:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 219 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88326</link>
      <description>Transaction value remains the normal basis for customs valuation and may be rejected only on valid grounds. For imported umbrella components, the Revenue failed to establish a reliable basis for discarding the declared value or for applying best judgment valuation under Rule 8 of the Customs (Valuation) Rules, 1988. The pro rata enhancement adopted by the lower authorities was therefore not sustainable, and the declared transaction value could not be rejected on the facts stated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>