<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 218 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88325</link>
    <description>Tea cess under the Tea Act, 1953 is not leviable on tea waste because the statutory definition does not include tea waste and the Board&#039;s circular s that no cess is to be collected on it. The dispute was confined to cess liability under the Tea Act and did not concern the excisability of the waste. The impugned order was held to be consistent with the statutory scheme and departmental instructions, so the Revenue&#039;s appeals failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:30:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 218 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88325</link>
      <description>Tea cess under the Tea Act, 1953 is not leviable on tea waste because the statutory definition does not include tea waste and the Board&#039;s circular s that no cess is to be collected on it. The dispute was confined to cess liability under the Tea Act and did not concern the excisability of the waste. The impugned order was held to be consistent with the statutory scheme and departmental instructions, so the Revenue&#039;s appeals failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>