https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88311 The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi ruled in a case concerning the classification of Pidicryl 3252B under sub-heading 3906.90. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, granting relief to the appellant. The decision was based on the pre-dominance of the acrylic monomer in the contested goods, determining the classification under sub-heading 3906. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the acrylic monomer as the determinative factor for the classification of co-polymers and polymer blends, leading to the success of the appeal and the direction for appropriate relief in favor of the appellant. en-us Thu, 15 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:33:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88311 The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi ruled in a case concerning the classification of Pidicryl 3252B under sub-heading 3906.90. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, granting relief to the appellant. The decision was based on the pre-dominance of the acrylic monomer in the contested goods, determining the classification under sub-heading 3906. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the acrylic monomer as the determinative factor for the classification of co-polymers and polymer blends, leading to the success of the appeal and the direction for appropriate relief in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 15 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88311