<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 207 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88310</link>
    <description>Section 129E authorises dispensing with pre-deposit of duty and penalty, not redemption fine; as the stay petition sought relief only against confiscation and redemption of a truck and involved no duty or penalty, the application was dismissed as infructuous. The Tribunal also granted an early hearing request, noting that matters from 1997 were already being heard, and fixed the appeal for regular hearing on 10 March 1998.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:32:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 207 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88310</link>
      <description>Section 129E authorises dispensing with pre-deposit of duty and penalty, not redemption fine; as the stay petition sought relief only against confiscation and redemption of a truck and involved no duty or penalty, the application was dismissed as infructuous. The Tribunal also granted an early hearing request, noting that matters from 1997 were already being heard, and fixed the appeal for regular hearing on 10 March 1998.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>