<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 190 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88293</link>
    <description>Pre-deposit was waived in a stay proceeding because the excisable goods were still lying in the bonded storeroom and there was no material showing removal from the bonded premises. Duty was treated as arising only on removal, so the demand was not regarded as exigible at that stage. The matter was therefore directed to proceed to regular hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:55:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 190 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88293</link>
      <description>Pre-deposit was waived in a stay proceeding because the excisable goods were still lying in the bonded storeroom and there was no material showing removal from the bonded premises. Duty was treated as arising only on removal, so the demand was not regarded as exigible at that stage. The matter was therefore directed to proceed to regular hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>