<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 188 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88291</link>
    <description>Declared customs value cannot be rejected or assessable value enhanced on the basis of quotations and complainant-supplied material alone, absent reliable contemporaneous import evidence or equivalent proof of undervaluation. The Department failed to establish deliberate under-valuation, so the valuation enhancement under the customs valuation framework was unsustainable. Because the alleged excess licence value depended entirely on that enhanced valuation, the basis for confiscation under import licence provisions also fell away. The confiscation and consequential penalty were therefore not sustainable, and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:47:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 188 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88291</link>
      <description>Declared customs value cannot be rejected or assessable value enhanced on the basis of quotations and complainant-supplied material alone, absent reliable contemporaneous import evidence or equivalent proof of undervaluation. The Department failed to establish deliberate under-valuation, so the valuation enhancement under the customs valuation framework was unsustainable. Because the alleged excess licence value depended entirely on that enhanced valuation, the basis for confiscation under import licence provisions also fell away. The confiscation and consequential penalty were therefore not sustainable, and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>