<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 187 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88290</link>
    <description>Wrongly carried forward and utilised Modvat credit was treated as an incorrect balance transfer rather than a wholly deliberate act, so the assessee received the benefit of doubt on intent. The demand for the undetected wrongly utilised credit was nonetheless upheld because the credit had in fact been taken and used improperly. The penalty was found excessive on the facts and was reduced accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:46:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 187 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88290</link>
      <description>Wrongly carried forward and utilised Modvat credit was treated as an incorrect balance transfer rather than a wholly deliberate act, so the assessee received the benefit of doubt on intent. The demand for the undetected wrongly utilised credit was nonetheless upheld because the credit had in fact been taken and used improperly. The penalty was found excessive on the facts and was reduced accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>