<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 362 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88287</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on inputs had to be taken within a reasonable time, which the Tribunal treated as six months from receipt of the inputs in the factory. Credit taken after more than six months was held to be belated and therefore not sustainable. The demand restored by the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner was upheld, leaving the Revenue successful on the limitation for availing credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:36:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 362 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88287</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on inputs had to be taken within a reasonable time, which the Tribunal treated as six months from receipt of the inputs in the factory. Credit taken after more than six months was held to be belated and therefore not sustainable. The demand restored by the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner was upheld, leaving the Revenue successful on the limitation for availing credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>