<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 356 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88281</link>
    <description>Machinery used to wind yarn from spindle stage into cones was treated as prima facie capital goods under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, where the process was said to make the yarn marketable and to effect a commercially different form or identity. The Tribunal held that the expression &quot;change&quot; in Rule 57Q was not confined to physical or chemical change and could include a change in commercial identity or form. On that prima facie basis, and because the applicant showed a strong case on eligibility of the autoconer and its accessories, pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived and stay of recovery was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:22:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 356 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88281</link>
      <description>Machinery used to wind yarn from spindle stage into cones was treated as prima facie capital goods under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, where the process was said to make the yarn marketable and to effect a commercially different form or identity. The Tribunal held that the expression &quot;change&quot; in Rule 57Q was not confined to physical or chemical change and could include a change in commercial identity or form. On that prima facie basis, and because the applicant showed a strong case on eligibility of the autoconer and its accessories, pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived and stay of recovery was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>