<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 351 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88276</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 74/62 was treated as available for C.I. cast articles manufactured from duty paid pig iron, because the notification did not expressly confine the raw material to old iron or steel scrap. The Tribunal applied the established interpretive approach that ambiguity in an exemption provision must be resolved in favour of the assessee. On that basis, the final products were regarded as within the scope of the notification and exemption was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:08:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 351 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88276</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 74/62 was treated as available for C.I. cast articles manufactured from duty paid pig iron, because the notification did not expressly confine the raw material to old iron or steel scrap. The Tribunal applied the established interpretive approach that ambiguity in an exemption provision must be resolved in favour of the assessee. On that basis, the final products were regarded as within the scope of the notification and exemption was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>