<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 349 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88274</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Collector of Customs, Jaipur, against a 100% export-oriented unit for non-payment of dues. The impugned order was found defective as it did not address proposed confiscation of goods or confirm the demand against the defaulting unit. The tribunal deemed the request for remand legitimate to rectify these deficiencies. The appeal was held valid despite being filed in the wrong form. The non-rejoinder of RIICO Ltd. as a respondent was deemed unnecessary, and the tribunal emphasized the need for remand due to the incomplete nature of the impugned order, setting it aside for a fresh order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:00:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 349 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88274</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Collector of Customs, Jaipur, against a 100% export-oriented unit for non-payment of dues. The impugned order was found defective as it did not address proposed confiscation of goods or confirm the demand against the defaulting unit. The tribunal deemed the request for remand legitimate to rectify these deficiencies. The appeal was held valid despite being filed in the wrong form. The non-rejoinder of RIICO Ltd. as a respondent was deemed unnecessary, and the tribunal emphasized the need for remand due to the incomplete nature of the impugned order, setting it aside for a fresh order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>