<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (10) TMI 231 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88263</link>
    <description>A recipient authority cannot deny Modvat credit by questioning the duty paid by a supplier whose assessment has already been accepted in the supplier&#039;s jurisdiction; any challenge must first be taken against that assessment before the proper authority. The renovation-related proviso to Rule 57T(3) applies only within its limited contractor or job-worker framework for renovation, modernisation or expansion, and does not extend to a principal-to-principal renovator. On these principles, the restriction and partial disallowance of credit could not be sustained, and the assessee&#039;s credit entitlement remained intact.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:21:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (10) TMI 231 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88263</link>
      <description>A recipient authority cannot deny Modvat credit by questioning the duty paid by a supplier whose assessment has already been accepted in the supplier&#039;s jurisdiction; any challenge must first be taken against that assessment before the proper authority. The renovation-related proviso to Rule 57T(3) applies only within its limited contractor or job-worker framework for renovation, modernisation or expansion, and does not extend to a principal-to-principal renovator. On these principles, the restriction and partial disallowance of credit could not be sustained, and the assessee&#039;s credit entitlement remained intact.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>