<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (10) TMI 230 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88262</link>
    <description>Modvat credit could not be refused merely because the supplier&#039;s dealer registration was obtained after the invoice date. Notification No. 64/94 clarified that documents issued by a registered person before registration could still be accepted if that person was otherwise eligible to issue the invoice under Notification No. 15/94. A blanket rejection without considering this clarification was unsustainable, but entitlement still depended on factual verification of the supplier&#039;s eligibility. The matter therefore required examination by the original authority for verification of the relevant facts before credit could be allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:19:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (10) TMI 230 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88262</link>
      <description>Modvat credit could not be refused merely because the supplier&#039;s dealer registration was obtained after the invoice date. Notification No. 64/94 clarified that documents issued by a registered person before registration could still be accepted if that person was otherwise eligible to issue the invoice under Notification No. 15/94. A blanket rejection without considering this clarification was unsustainable, but entitlement still depended on factual verification of the supplier&#039;s eligibility. The matter therefore required examination by the original authority for verification of the relevant facts before credit could be allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>