<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (12) TMI 218 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88237</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision to classify the product, Kaolin Light IP &amp;amp; NF, under Chapter 2505.10 instead of Chapter 30 as a medicament. The appellant failed to prove the product met the criteria for classification as a medicament under Chapter 30, such as containing multiple constituents or being packaged for retail sale or hospital use. Therefore, the appeals were dismissed, emphasizing the need for sufficient evidence to support classification claims under the Customs Tariff Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:15:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (12) TMI 218 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88237</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision to classify the product, Kaolin Light IP &amp;amp; NF, under Chapter 2505.10 instead of Chapter 30 as a medicament. The appellant failed to prove the product met the criteria for classification as a medicament under Chapter 30, such as containing multiple constituents or being packaged for retail sale or hospital use. Therefore, the appeals were dismissed, emphasizing the need for sufficient evidence to support classification claims under the Customs Tariff Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>